Wednesday, May 3, 2017

Final Lesson Reflection

For the second "at bat" I modified the lesson in a few ways.

I still wanted listening and diversity to be the central focus of the lesson.  This time, however, I made the diversity piece more subtle (but with equal impact).  In the 1st lesson I played recording of an pianist and then had the students guess their race/gender and then sketch what they think the musician looked like.  In the new lesson, I gave each student a packet containing pictures/profiles of a diverse group of pianists, then I randomly played a recording of each musician represented in the packet.  I asked the students to match the artist with the recording and hold up their choice for me to see.  I then revealed who the artist was and asked the students to answer the pre-written questions on that artist's page.

Overall, I felt that this lesson was more successful than the first.

1.  Student engagement seemed to be the biggest improvement.  When the packets were passed out everyone seemed to look through them with interest and curiosity.   As each recording was played, students were actively listening and formulating their responses.

2.  Elimination of the computer/smart board helped me narrow the classroom area down and keep the students more focused on the material and me.

3.  The lesson packet provided a tangible method for student response and improved assessment.  It also served as a jumping off point for future lessons on specific pianists.

4.  My goal was to make the students hungry for more info about the piano.  I think, if this class had been 9th grade general music, that would been an achievable goal.

With a few more tweaks this lesson could go in the tool bag.





Monday, April 3, 2017

"The Audience"

Why do we have performing ensembles? The answer is in the title.

The audience is the only true assessor of our work.  Not the principal, not the superintendent; it’s the audience.


There’s nothing I hate more than to go to a public concert and hear an experiment rather than a show, especially if it funded by my tax dollars.  If I want to hear that I’ll go to a college recital (and in my opinion that’s really not the best venue for it either).  


But we have student bands, so we’re allowed to experiment right?  We’re exempt from having to be entertaining right?  I mean, we have to buy every crappy new arrangement on JW Pepper so that we can mix it up and always have something fresh, right?  And we absolutely must play, at least once, Techeli’s 10 minute long “Blue Shades”.  Everyone knows that one, it’s an absolute crowd pleaser…right?  


My cynicism is routed in love.  I love the opportunity that our students have to perform for the public. They are the shiny beacon of music education advocacy.  But if we are not audience centric, we lose the audience.  Without the audience, we lose our advocates.


So, how do we build and keep an audience?


Here are some strategies that are used by U.S. military bands when programing for audiences around the world.


1. The audience comes first.  They’re the taxpayers and the voters.  Our yearning to play longer, faster, louder, darker, more complex, cutting edge, etc. is secondary to pleasing the audience.


2.  Look at every gig as a “commercial” gig:  You’re hired to play want the audience wants (popular/standards/nostalgic) and needs (national holiday or remembrance).


3.  When performing in the U.S., always start with the U.S. National Anthem (or play it after your intro song).  Not only is it the right thing to do;  the vast majority of regular concert goers, are patriotic citizens who appreciate a little “Americana” sprinkled in.


4.  No matter what ensemble is performing, It’s ALWAYS show business.  Whether it’s your flute duet, jazz band, or wind ensemble; you gotta sell it.


6.  Have a variety of music ready in case you miscalculated the demographic.  This may be hard to do with rehearsal time constraints.  This is were #9 comes in.


7.  If some songs aren’t presented…. you may be dead to the audience.  i.e. you’re doing a traditional big band concert at the Elks Club and you don’t play “In the Mood”.


8.  No concert, jazz, or rock band should be without a vocalist or two. Lack of vocals was one of the number one complaints during feedback surveys that I conducted.


9.  Brass Bands and rock/show bands can enhance (and maybe even save) your concert band/wind ensemble show.


10.  “Create-a-gig-at-school” audiences are usually small and primarily made up of insiders.  If you want to reach general audiences as well, try to perform at established concert venues during regularly scheduled events.  Why can’t school bands open for a local community band/symphony/jazz band or play on the town green during the art festival?  Some organizations may even want to make your band the main attraction at their event.  It’s a win-win.


No matter how you slice it, the audience is the key.  Make them clap, make them tap, make them happy!


Here are some good examples of audience centric programing:
U.S. Navy Band - Jersey Boys:




U.S. Navy Band - Thriller:




U.S. Navy Commodores - Grinch:




U.S. Navy Band - 12 Days of Christmas:




U.S. Air Force Band - Smithsonian Flash Mob




U.S. Navy Cruisers - Wade on the Water


U.S. Navy Band and Cruisers - I Feel Good:




Navy Band Northeast Brass Band:


We used the brass band to attract the walk by traffic to Bryant Park for our wind ensemble concert.  It worked - we filled up the green with over 10,000 people (for an unadvertised show).




Navy Band Northeast’s top 40 band “Rhode Island Sound” - Shake It Off


https://youtu.be/LkiJNScBYVA


U.S. Naval Forces Europe Band - Edinburgh Military Tattoo (at 21:55)


We were asked to program theme songs to popular superhero and cartoon shows for the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee.





Tuesday, March 28, 2017

Can I interest you in a box of apples?

Should modern school music programs have to rely on the financial support of parents and fundraisers? -a question likely asked every day, somewhere in the US.

My short answer is yes……But rather than feeling like they HAVE to, they should WANT to. Before everyone starts throwing knives; give me a few lines.

There is no doubt that states/districts/schools should fund music programs, at least as much as they fund sports programs, if not more.  I’ll defend that point until I’m dead.  If you are reading this, you don’t need me to convince you as to why.  I also don’t need to tell you how important it is for band directors to maintain control of the direction that their bands are headed.  They need to be behind the wheel, not the school.  But…..he/she who owns the car...drives the car, right?  So the district can steer the car (or at least feel like they do) for the regular classroom curriculum, etc., because they pay for that.  But when it’s time to take the car on a joy ride and do really cool things...they may put on the breaks.  This is where private funding comes in handy.

We’ve all been there, with our hats out or selling our wares.  It’s a headache to raise money, but the benefits far outway the costs.   We are not only earning money for our program; we are earning some independence from the purse of our programs true owner.  

The bottom line is: If we pay for a little maintainence and put some gas in the car once in awhile, we have some leverage on when, where, and how we drive it.

Monday, March 20, 2017

Technology in the Classroom




As Howard Hughes was portrayed to say:   https://youtu.be/aT_j36TYOX0


I am admittedly a tech geek and have been since the first Franklin computer came out in 1983:




I had one like this, connected to a mono-color monitor…..And I felt sooo innovative.  I would sit up late at night and type out poems and stories (yes at seven, I was weird).  A bit later I added a dot matrix printer and wow….I could print my masterpieces and show them to people!


Fast forward ten years:  I now had a commodore 64 that was way cooler with its 800k floppy drive…...which led to an amazing discovery. A floppy disc with some printable music on it!!


So I found a cool duet written in treble clef. I printed it out and then transposed it, by hand, into bass clef.  I took my new “composition” to school and to show it off.  I played the duet with a few fellow trombonists and started getting some great praise…..until a good friend and now Trumpet Professor, Travis Heath, pulled me aside and said, “You’re not a composer just because you transposed Bach’s Invention No. 8 from treble to bass clef.” - Oops.  This was the first time that I loved and hated technology, at the same time.


After plagiarizing Bach, I continued to mix technology and music.  From cool computer generated sounds and video game music soundtracks to live recording and composition programs, there was always something cool going on.  But I did this all from home.  There was no connection between my music/technology dabbling and my traditional music class.  There wasn’t really much relevance back then.  But now….the sky’s the limit.  The technology available to music educators today seems limitless, yet many school music departments remain as the last bastions of technology free zones. Why is that?  Is there no way to enhance rehearsals and performances with the use us technology? How about the tons of paper that we go through every year?  Or the forever lost originals? Can technology save a tree or two?


As schools (like mine) move to a 1:1 model with each student getting a chromebook or similar device, the possibilities become endless.  Students can use their devices as music readers,  tuners, metronomes, or even video record themselves practice or perform.  This is already the norm for many students outside of the classroom.  Inside the classroom, however, device integration is only trickling in.  Check out this article titled “The Paperless Music Classroom”:




It gives some insight into hardware, software, costs, management, funding and the pros/cons of going almost completely paperless in the music classroom.


Although this may seem like a pipe dream in some school districts, you never know when money will be dropped in your lap.  Many schools are budgeting for 1:1 technology right now for the near future. It’s not too early to develop a technology implementation plan and have it at the ready.


Just be sure none of your students steal from Bach…...at least, not too much.

Monday, March 6, 2017

Blog Prompt #4


A rubric is like a recipe: a way to control and determine quality based on the author’s criteria.  

I love recipes!  The thought of making the perfect sauce; a near guarantee of accolades from my family and friends; the safety and comfort of following instructions……..low stress, high praise!  Right?  Isn’t that what life’s all about?

One could ask:

Is the sauce perfect or is it perfectly copied?  

Is it a masterpiece or simply another master’s piece?  

Are they proud of me……. or the recipe?

(put a little beat behind this, lol)

Maybe:

-I’ll focus less on the recipe and more on curiosity

   -less on the ink and more on my instinct

-Don’t limit my capacity with boxed-up words and scholastic-ese

-Trust me, I’ll comply…….just give me room to fly

I just had too:


Hopefully this sums up my feelings on rubrics.  If not, well I guess I didn’t follow the rubric well enough…...

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

Should music educators be experts in jazz or American folk music?


Experts…..may be a stretch, but music educators should at least be competent in the subjects of jazz and American folk music.  They should definitely recognize the importance of these subjects and insure that students understand their significance in music history and their impact on the music of today.  


For aspiring performers, this exposure is critical.  There is more and more demand for the “commercial” player who can move through various styles with ease.  Someone who can play Souza in the morning, Coldplay in the afternoon, and Ellington in the evening.  I may be a bit bias about this but I think it’s for good reason.  I auditioned hundreds of musicians for the Navy Music Program and although many of them passed the audition, not all of those who passed were suitable for the rigors of professional music.  As Navy Band’s shrunk in size over the years, due to budget cuts, musical versatility became more important than ever.  A trumpet player couldn’t just be a good “legit” player; he/she had to jump from the wind ensemble or ceremonial band into the jazz or top 40 groups, and play just as well.  For me, as a trombonist, this was a daily reality:


0800 - Wind Ensemble rehearsal
0930 - Ceremonial Band gig
1230 - Jazz Band Rehearsal
1430 - Top 40 Band Rehearsal
1800 - Jazz Combo gig


This is the reality of more and more professional musicians: Cruise ships, “pops” ensembles, recording studios, community bands, etc, are all in need of versatile players.  Exposure to and performance of Jazz and American folk music at the grade school levels arms students with the tools needed in the competitive world of professional music.


This list from the "Get America Singing, Again" Campaign contains many songs that students should learn.  



Volume I

1. Amazing Grace
2. America (My Country, ‘Tis of Thee)
3. America the Beautiful
4. Battle Hymn of the Republic
5. Blue Skies
6. Danny Boy (Londonderry Air)
7. De colores
8. Do-Re-Mi
9. Down by the Riverside
10. Frere Jaques
11. Give my Regards to Broadway
12. God Bless America
13. God Bless the U.S.A.
14. Green, Green Grass of Home
15. Havah Nagilah
16. He’s Got the Whole World in His Hands
17. Home on the Range
18. I’ve Been Working on the Railroad
19. If I Had a Hammer (The Hammer Song)
20. Let There Be Peace on Earth
21. Lift Ev’ry Voice and Sing
22. Michael (Row the Boat Ashore)
23. Dona Nobis Pachem
24. Music Alone Shall Live
25. My Bonnie Lies Over the Ocean
26. Oh, What a Beautiful Mornin’
27. Oh! Susanna
28. Over My Head
29. Puff the Magic Dragon
30. Rock-A-My Soul
31. Sakura
32. Shalom Chaverim
33. She’ll Be Comin’ ‘Round the Mountain
34. Shenandoah
35. Simple Gifts
36. Sometimes I Feel Like a Motherless Child
37. Swing Low, Sweet Chariot
38. This Land is Your Land
39. The Star Spangled Banner
40. Take Me Out to the Ball Game
41. This Little Light of Mine
42. Yesterday
43. Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Dah
Volume II

1. All Through the Night (traditional)
2. Auld Lang Syne (traditional)
3. Both Sides Now (Joni Mitchell)
4. Camptown Races (Stephen Foster)
5. Clementine (traditional)
6. Down In the Valley (traditional)
7. Edelweiss (Rodgers and Hammerstein)
8. Erie Canal (traditional)
9. Ev’ry Time I Feel the Spirit (traditional)
10. Five Hundred Miles (Hedy West)
11. Follow the Drinkin’ Gourd (traditional)
12. Getting to Know You (Rodgers and Hammerstein)
13. Guantanamera (Pete Seeger & Jose Marti)
14. I Love the Mountains (traditional)
15. I’ve Got Rhythm (George Gershwin)
16. Irene Goodnight (Huddie Ledbetter)
17. It’s a Small World (Shermans)
18. Jamaica Farewell (Irving Burgie)
19. Kum Ba Yah (traditional)
20. Let It Be (Lennon & McCartney)
21. Let Me Call You Sweetheart (traditional)
22. Make New Friends (traditional)
23. Midnight Special (Huddie Ledbetter)
24. My Favorite Things (Rodgers and Hammerstein)
25. Old MacDonald Had a Farm (traditional)
26. Over the Rainbow (Harold Arlen)
27. Peace Like a River (traditional)
28. Precious Lord (Thomas Dorsey)
29. Red River Valley (traditional)
30. Rock Around the Clock (Max Freedman & Jimmy DeKnight)
31. Side By Side (Harry Woods)
32. Take Me Home, Country Roads (John Denver/Bill Danoff/Taffy Danoff)
33. To Every Season (Turn! Turn! Turn!) (Pete Seeger)
34. Try to Remember (Harvey Schmidt & Tom Jones)
35. The Water Is Wide (traditional)
36. We Shall Overcome (Horton, Seeger, Carawan)
37. What a Wonderful World (Theile Weiss)
38. When Johnny Comes Marching Home (Patrick Gilmore)
39. When the Saints Go Marching In (traditional)
40. Where Have All the Flowers Gone (Pete Seeger)
41. Yankee Doodle (traditional)
42. You Are My Sunshine (Davis/Mitchell)
43. You Are the Sunshine of My Life (Stevie Wonder)
44. You’re a Grand Old Flag (George M. Cohan)
45. You’ve Got a Friend (Carole King)


Friday, February 17, 2017


“Creating Musical Flexibility Through the Ensemble”
Article critique


This article challenges the relevance of the traditional music program and poses some interesting questions.  Why can’t students be performers and composers? How can we meet all of the standards if we only focus on performance?  How do we balance these things? Mr. Schneider highlights the challenges of building a new music program, through his experience,  and offers great “outside of the box” solutions that can help programs of any size.  


On the subjects of musical discipline, technique, theory, and composition; Mr. Schneider points out that students should be able to transpose and cover parts when needed.  The expectations should not be limited to just being there and playing your part well.  Students should know their instrument well and develop a good ear.  They should all have a good understanding of melodic and harmonic theory and be able to compose their own music.


As a member of a large powerhouse high school band, I was never exposed to any of the concepts above except for listening and developing a good ear..  There was no apparent need for me to play another part other than my own and there was no time for theory.  The expectation was: you will play your part well and help ensure we get superiors and win.  Win, win, win.  There was no time for switching parts around or discussing theoretical concepts.  Downbeat was five minutes after class starts and horns were away five minutes before the bell.  Rinse and repeat.  The results were great for the music program and school district.  Many of my classmates went on to college level music programs and/or professional careers in music.  I went directly into the Marine Corps Music Program.  That being said; I​ ​agree​ ​that​ ​students​ ​should​ ​be​ ​as​ ​well​ ​rounded​ ​as​ ​possible.  I could have benefited from the methodology that Mr. Schneider outlines in all four areas.  It certainly would have helped my overall musicianship.  There have been times in my career that would have been easier if I was armed with more of those tools.


How do we know is someone is a good musician?  This question probably elicits a wide spectrum of responses, as it should.  I’ll be fairly straight forward with this.  


The answer is in the audience.  Smiles, foot tapping, swaying, grooving, dancing, etc…..A good musician will connect with and move the audience, even if the audience is just a friend in the room.  I don’t think there are many “great” musicians, but there are many “good” musicians that constantly seek improvement….and that’s what makes them good.         

 

Sunday, February 12, 2017

Clarinet Lesson Reflection

Like many others, I spent much time trying to figure out the most efficient use of the first five minutes of the lesson.  Considering that there would be another 35 minutes left, my primary concern was how to capture and maintain the students attention.  

I have a personal philosophy: "Inspiration fosters aspiration."  Thats why I decided to start the lesson with a recording of Eddie Daniels playing a portion of "Spring 1" from his album The Five Seasons.  I think it was effective, however, there are several things that could have made it more exciting and really "set-the-hook" better.

1.  Professor Schneider recommended having the instrument already put together, ready to be place in the students hands.  What a great way to enhance  the experience!  I could give the clarinet to the student right away, play the recording, and then persuade him/her to move with the music.  Then I could record this on my phone and send it to his/her parents (as per another suggestion by Prof. Schneider).  This would definitely help inspire the student and leave a lasting impression.

2.  Professor S. also hit most of us on talking to much.  This is a long-standing habit if mine.  In this case I could the let the instrument and music do most of the talking.  It's unlikely that the student will be able to play any distinguishable notes on the clarinet in 40 minutes, but they could have fun while trying.  A funny video (like the clarinetist swinging on the pole) may help fill time and keep the students attention too.  Perhaps let the student guide the discussion from there.

One of the most helpful parts of this particular class was the opportunity to watch other classmates teach their lessons.  I was filling my toolbox with some great ideas!

        

Sunday, February 5, 2017

     Core Values

      I believe that the performance and study of music develops better humans, reveals our sense of purpose, and prepares us to cohabitant, participate, and thrive in a diverse world.

      I believe that music should be taught in a loving and nurturing environment, with an appropriate amount of structure and support.  Music students should be introduced to a vast library of musical styles and genres, and encouraged to explore and develop their own unique artistic identity.

      I believe that we have a responsibility to reinforce, elevate, and perpetuate the position of music in society, by educating the next generation of listeners, performers, and musical leaders. 

Sunday, January 29, 2017

I talk about discipline alot with my NJROTC students; not because of the obvious connection that the word has to military life, but because I don't want them to fear it.  I like how Peter Boonshaft speaks to this point in his book: Teaching Music With Purpose.


"Reactive discipline is the one with the terrible reputation, and deservedly so. It is had, always had. It is putting out the fires of poor behavior after they have started to burn. It is reacting to bad behavior, placing the teacher in the position of trying to "catch up" to those hehaviors, leaving little time or energy for moving the group along the path of learning, because we spend so much of it just keeping them on that path.


Proactive discipline, however, is good. It is positive and necessary. It is how we control and focus an ensemble so our students want to move, let alone have no choice but to move, along that path.
Proactive discipline is how we determine outcomes, set the stride, control the classroom. Surely we will encounter, and must be capable of handling, both types of discipline. In fact, the skills and techniques used to manage and deal with both types of discipline are identical; it is only the context that differentiates them."

Friday, January 27, 2017

Hello All! Check out my "About Chris" and "Pictures" pages to get things started.